|
|
[Copyright
the Fellowship for Intentional Community 1996]
A Word About Cults
by Corinne McLaughlin and Gordon Davidsonp>
Corinne McLaughlin and Gordon Davidson elaborate on the differences
between growth-enhancing intentional communities and "cults" -- groups
that may restrict individual free will and personal freedom.
At the same time that the hippie communes were attracting major
attention in the '60s and early '70s, the so-called "cults" --
manipulative, authoritarian mass movements -- began growing in
popularity and attracting many young people who were generally confused
and lost, or burned out on drugs. Today, the cults are still recruiting
large numbers of people, and are still sensationalized in the media.
Many people are desperate to change themselves and to change the world.
Some are so lonely and alienated from family, religion, or friendships
that any group that looks loving and supportive is very magnetic, even
if the price is one's personal freedom. The very legitimate search for
truth, personal and spiritual values, and transcendence is easily
exploited by power-driven "cult" leaders.
There is a problem, though, in defining exactly what a cult is. The
point at which a group actually crosses the line between what is
acceptable and what is not depends a great deal on a person's values. As
Ken Keyes, author of The Handbook to Higher Consciousness, expressed
it:
-
A "cult" is a term you would use to apply to that which you don't
like...so I don't really have much use for that term. I could tell you
[about] the groups that I feel are sincerely trying to do something good
for the world and that I like...I don't consider them "cults."
-
It may be hard to define exactly what a cult is since it is such a
subjective, emotionally laden label. However, we would warn people about
a group that manifests many of the following traits.
-
- encourages the violation of personal ethics or encourages deception
to prove loyalty to the group
- encourages relinquishment of personal responsibility for actions
- restricts access to outside people or information
- inhibits critical thinking so that "group think" predominates, and
many subjects are taboo for discussion
- restricts the ability to leave the group
- restricts privacy
- uses intense indoctrination
- demands absolute obedience
- applies intense pressure toward groupconformity
- demands stereotyped behavior
- physically or psychologically encourages overdependency
- manipulates feelings in a conscious way
- appeals to fear of not being saved or enlightened
- appeals to greed
- appeals to power
- appeals to the glamour of being one of the elect
- appeals to vanity and flattery
- uses guilt or humiliation to control behavior
- employs intimidation or threats
- plays on low self-esteem or feelings of inadequacy
- encourages sexual relationships with group leaders
- uses high-pressure sales pitches and plays on loyalty of friends to attract members
- evidences extreme paranoia, as in stockpiling of firearms for "protection"
A common element that distinguishes a cult from a healthy, participative
community is interference with a person's free will rather than the
nurturing of its use. Free will is the most basic and inviolate
spiritual principle on earth. A benevolent community or spiritual
teacher will respect a person's free will and encourage members to
freely make their own choices, to take responsibility for any mistakes
made, and to learn from them.
Bibliography
Deikman, Arthur J., "The Evaluation of Spiritual and Utopian Groups,"
Journal of Humanistic Psychology (Summer 1983), and The Wrong Way Home:
Uncovering the Patterns of Cult Behavior in American Society (Boston:
Beacon Press, 1990), $19.95.
McLaughlin, Corinne, and Gordon Davidson, Builders of the Dawn:
Community Lifestyles in a Changing World (Shutesbury, MA: Sirius
Publishing, 1985), $17.95 plus $1.50 postage.
Vaughn, Frances, "A Question of Balance: Health and Pathology in New
Religious Movements," Journal of Humanistic Psychology (Summer
1983).
[Editor's note: Inclusiveness was a guiding value in creating the
Directory; so information on a wide array of choices is offered. As
editors we have relied primarily on information provided by local
community sources, and are not in a position to judge the quality of
some of this information. Still, there are "cult" communities -- so the
above guidelines may be helpful in distinguishing them for the vast
majority of benevolent and self-affirming intentional communities.]
Corinne McLaughlin and Gordon Davidson are cofounders of Sirius, an
educational center and ecological village, and are both Fellows of the
Findhorn Foundation in Scotland. Corinne has taught Transformational
Politics at American University in Washington, D.C., and worked for the
President's Council on Sustainable Development. Gordon formerly served
as Executive Director of the Social Investment Forum where he coauthored
the CERES Principles, a pledge of ecological responsibility for
corporations seeking recognition as socially responsible investments.
Gordon and Corinne's latest book is Spiritual Politics: Changing the
World from the Inside Out published by Ballentine Books, 1994. Their
discussion of cults is adapted from the fourth chapter of their basic
reference work on intentional community, Builders of the Dawn: Community
Lifestyles in a Changing World by Sirius Publishing, 1985 (reprinted
with permission).
|
|